1985 Jeep CJ vs. 1992 Maserati Shamal
To start off, 1992 Maserati Shamal is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,217 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Maserati Shamal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Maserati Shamal (321 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Maserati Shamal should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Maserati Shamal weights approximately 24 kg more than 1985 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Maserati Shamal. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Maserati Shamal (444 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1992 Maserati Shamal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Jeep CJ | 1992 Maserati Shamal | |
| Make | Jeep | Maserati |
| Model | CJ | Shamal |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1992 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3217 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 321 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 444 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2520 mm |
