1985 Jeep CJ vs. 1996 Lada Natacha
To start off, 1996 Lada Natacha is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Jeep CJ (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1996 Lada Natacha. (70 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada Natacha. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 306 kg more than 1996 Lada Natacha. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Lada Natacha. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Jeep CJ (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lada Natacha. (118 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1985 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lada Natacha.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Jeep CJ | 1996 Lada Natacha | |
| Make | Jeep | Lada |
| Model | CJ | Natacha |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1350 mm |
