1985 Jeep CJ vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Mazda 626 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda 626 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 106 kg more than 1996 Mazda 626.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Jeep CJ (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (145 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1985 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jeep CJ | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ | 626 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2620 mm |