1985 Jeep CJ vs. 1997 Suzuki C2
To start off, 1997 Suzuki C2 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 448 kg more than 1997 Suzuki C2.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Suzuki C2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1997 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Jeep CJ | 1997 Suzuki C2 | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | CJ | C2 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 284 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 848 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2240 mm |
