1985 Jeep CJ vs. 1998 Lotus 340 R
To start off, 1998 Lotus 340 R is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus 340 R (190 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus 340 R should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 621 kg more than 1998 Lotus 340 R.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Lotus 340 R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus 340 R (198 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus 340 R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Jeep CJ | 1998 Lotus 340 R | |
| Make | Jeep | Lotus |
| Model | CJ | 340 R |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1795 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1130 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2320 mm |
