1985 Jeep CJ vs. 2004 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2004 Toyota Camry is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,362 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Camry (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 352 kg more than 2004 Toyota Camry.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Toyota Camry. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Camry (220 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Jeep CJ | 2004 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Jeep | Toyota |
| Model | CJ | Camry |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2362 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 944 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2710 mm |
