1985 Jeep CJ vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 147 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 391 kg more than 1985 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Lincoln LS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (299 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Jeep CJ | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Jeep | Lincoln |
| Model | CJ | LS |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 232 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 299 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1687 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3030 mm |
