1985 Jeep CJ vs. 2005 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2005 Pagani Zonda is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2005 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Pagani Zonda (547 HP) has 462 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 46 kg more than 2005 Pagani Zonda.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Pagani Zonda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Pagani Zonda (750 Nm) has 600 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm). This means 2005 Pagani Zonda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Jeep CJ | 2005 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | Jeep | Pagani |
| Model | CJ | Zonda |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 7300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 547 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 750 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2055 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1151 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2730 mm |
