1985 Jeep CJ vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 167 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jeep CJ | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ | 6 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2680 mm |