1985 Jeep CJ vs. 2008 Mazda 3
To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 71 kg more than 2008 Mazda 3.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 3 (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jeep CJ | 2008 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ | 3 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2650 mm |