1985 Jeep CJ vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,261 cc, 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 88 kg more than 1985 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jeep CJ | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ | 6 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2261 cc |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1384 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2680 mm |