1985 Jeep CJ vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 2 kg more than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (184 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jeep CJ | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ | 6 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1294 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2680 mm |