1985 Jeep CJ vs. 2008 Rover 25
To start off, 2008 Rover 25 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Rover 25 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Rover 25 should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 191 kg more than 2008 Rover 25.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Rover 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Jeep CJ (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 25. (123 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1985 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jeep CJ | 2008 Rover 25 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | CJ | 25 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2510 mm |