1985 Jeep CJ vs. 2010 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2010 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki SX4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki SX4 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki SX4 should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 16 kg more than 2010 Suzuki SX4.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Suzuki SX4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Suzuki SX4 (190 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2010 Suzuki SX4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jeep CJ | 2010 Suzuki SX4 | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | CJ | SX4 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4511 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1544 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2499 mm |