1985 Jeep CJ vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ. 2011 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1985 Jeep CJ has manual transmission. 1985 Jeep CJ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jeep CJ | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | CJ | Epica |
Year Released | 1985 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2700 mm |