1985 Jeep CJ vs. 2012 BMW 320
To start off, 2012 BMW 320 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. Both 1985 Jeep CJ and 2012 BMW 320 are equipped with a 1,995 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 320 (182 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 320 (380 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2012 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jeep CJ | 2012 BMW 320 | |
Make | Jeep | BMW |
Model | CJ | 320 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4624 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2810 mm |