1985 Jeep CJ vs. 2012 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Ford Ecosport is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Ecosport (118 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Ecosport (170 Nm @ 1300 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Ecosport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Jeep CJ | 2012 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Jeep | Ford |
| Model | CJ | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 1300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
