1985 Jeep CJ vs. 2013 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2013 Toyota Highlander is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Highlander (228 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 813 kg more than 1985 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Highlander (292 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Jeep CJ | 2013 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | CJ | Highlander |
Year Released | 1985 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 2109 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4795 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2790 mm |