1985 Lada 2105 vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Lada 2105 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1985 Lada 2105. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1985 Lada 2105.
Because 1985 Lada 2105 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Lada 2105. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Lada 2105 | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Lada | Nissan |
Model | 2105 | Pixo |
Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2360 mm |