1985 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1985 Maserati Bi Turbo. (182 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1985 Maserati Bi Turbo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 555 kg more than 1985 Maserati Bi Turbo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Maserati Bi Turbo. (305 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Maserati Bi Turbo | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | Maserati | Renault |
Model | Bi Turbo | Clio |
Year Released | 1985 | 1996 |
Engine Size | 2490 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2490 mm |