1985 Mazda 323 vs. 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee (114 HP @ 3900 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1985 Mazda 323. (66 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1985 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 984 kg more than 1985 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Mazda 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee (300 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mazda 323. (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mazda 323.

Compare all specifications: