1985 Mazda 323 vs. 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK

To start off, 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK (129 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1985 Mazda 323. (72 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1985 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 600 kg more than 1985 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK (185 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mazda 323. (111 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mazda 323.

Compare all specifications:

1985 Mazda 323 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK
Make Mazda Mercedes-Benz
Model 323 CLK
Year Released 1985 1999
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1498 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 72 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 111 Nm 185 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 3700 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.6:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 900 kg 1500 kg
Vehicle Width 1640 mm 1730 mm