1985 Mazda 323 vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1985 Mazda 323. (66 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1985 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S60 weights approximately 701 kg more than 1985 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Mazda 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo S60 (400 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mazda 323. (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Mazda 323 | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | 323 | S60 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1324 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 295 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1950 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1571 kg |
