1985 Mazda 323 vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Mazda 323 (103 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2010 Ford C-Max. (95 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 610 kg more than 1985 Mazda 323.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford C-Max (230 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mazda 323. (137 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2010 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Mazda 323 | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 323 | C-Max |
Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2788 mm |