1985 Mazda 323 vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,324 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Mazda 323 (66 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Mazda 323 (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1985 Mazda 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Mazda 323 | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 323 | Clio |
Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |