1985 Mazda 323 vs. 2012 Renault Clio

To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1985 Mazda 323. (66 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1985 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Clio weights approximately 345 kg more than 1985 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Clio (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mazda 323. (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mazda 323. 2012 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 1985 Mazda 323 has manual transmission. 1985 Mazda 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: