1985 Mazda 626 vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Mazda 626 (102 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Mazda 626 (157 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1985 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Mazda 626 | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 626 | Clio |
Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 76.8 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2480 mm |