1985 Mazda 929 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1985 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1985 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 598 kg more than 1985 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Mazda 929 | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
| Model | 929 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1969 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1748 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2880 mm |
