1985 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2011 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2011 Jeep Compass is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1985 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Mazda RX-7 (165 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2011 Jeep Compass. (158 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2011 Jeep Compass.
Because 1985 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Mazda RX-7 (225 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Jeep Compass. (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1985 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Mazda RX-7 | 2011 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Mazda | Jeep |
Model | RX-7 | Compass |
Year Released | 1985 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2634 mm |