1985 Mercedes-Benz 230 vs. 2005 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2005 Suzuki XL7 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercedes-Benz 230. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercedes-Benz 230 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (185 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1985 Mercedes-Benz 230. (134 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki XL7 should accelerate faster than 1985 Mercedes-Benz 230. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 147 kg more than 1985 Mercedes-Benz 230. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (250 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mercedes-Benz 230. (205 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki XL7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mercedes-Benz 230.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Mercedes-Benz 230 | 2005 Suzuki XL7 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Suzuki |
| Model | 230 | XL7 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2737 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 185 HP |
| Torque | 205 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.5 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80.3 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.3 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 64 L |
