1985 Mercury Cougar vs. 1968 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1985 Mercury Cougar is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 496 kg more than 1968 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Mercury Cougar | 1968 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Mercury | Zastava |
Model | Cougar | 1300 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2430 mm |