1985 Mercury Cougar vs. 1992 Volvo 850
To start off, 1992 Volvo 850 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 1992 Volvo 850 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 40 kg more than 1992 Volvo 850.
Because 1985 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 850, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Mercury Cougar | 1992 Volvo 850 | |
Make | Mercury | Volvo |
Model | Cougar | 850 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 167 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2510 mm |