1985 Mercury Lynx vs. 1997 Suzuki C2
To start off, 1997 Suzuki C2 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,859 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1985 Mercury Lynx. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 1985 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Mercury Lynx weights approximately 177 kg more than 1997 Suzuki C2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mercury Lynx. (144 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1997 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Mercury Lynx | 1997 Suzuki C2 | |
Make | Mercury | Suzuki |
Model | Lynx | C2 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1859 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 284 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 848 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2240 mm |