1985 Mercury Lynx vs. 2005 Mini One
To start off, 2005 Mini One is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,859 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 89 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mini One weights approximately 90 kg more than 1985 Mercury Lynx.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Mercury Lynx (144 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mini One. (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1985 Mercury Lynx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mini One.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Mercury Lynx | 2005 Mini One | |
| Make | Mercury | Mini |
| Model | Lynx | One |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1859 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 1115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2470 mm |
