1985 Mercury Lynx vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1985 Mercury Lynx. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1985 Mercury Lynx.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mercury Lynx. (144 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Mercury Lynx | 2010 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Mercury | Renault |
| Model | Lynx | Megane |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1859 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2630 mm |
