1985 Mercury Lynx vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,859 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1985 Mercury Lynx. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1985 Mercury Lynx.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (148 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mercury Lynx. (144 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Mercury Lynx | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Mercury | Holden |
| Model | Lynx | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1859 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2685 mm |
