1985 Mercury Sable vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1985 Mercury Sable is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 2,937 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Triumph Vitesse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Triumph Vitesse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Mercury Sable | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Mercury | Triumph |
Model | Sable | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1985 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2937 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1530 mm |