1985 Mercury Sable vs. 1969 Plymouth Barracuda
To start off, 1985 Mercury Sable is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Plymouth Barracuda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Plymouth Barracuda would be higher. At 3,685 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Plymouth Barracuda is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Plymouth Barracuda weights approximately 5 kg more than 1985 Mercury Sable.
Because 1969 Plymouth Barracuda is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Plymouth Barracuda. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Mercury Sable | 1969 Plymouth Barracuda | |
| Make | Mercury | Plymouth |
| Model | Sable | Barracuda |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2512 cc | 3685 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1405 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2760 mm |
