1985 Mercury Sable vs. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1985 Mercury Sable is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 400 kg more than 1985 Mercury Sable.
Because 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Mercury Sable | 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mercury | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Sable | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2512 cc | 7462 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 248 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2850 mm |
