1985 Mercury Sable vs. 1980 Volvo 265
To start off, 1985 Mercury Sable is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 265 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1985 Mercury Sable.
Because 1980 Volvo 265 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 265. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Mercury Sable | 1980 Volvo 265 | |
| Make | Mercury | Volvo |
| Model | Sable | 265 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2512 cc | 2849 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |
