1985 Mercury Sable vs. 2000 Plymouth Prowler
To start off, 2000 Plymouth Prowler is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Plymouth Prowler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Mercury Sable weights approximately 80 kg more than 2000 Plymouth Prowler.
Because 2000 Plymouth Prowler is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Plymouth Prowler. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Mercury Sable | 2000 Plymouth Prowler | |
Make | Mercury | Plymouth |
Model | Sable | Prowler |
Year Released | 1985 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2512 cc | 3507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2880 mm |