1985 Mercury Sable vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Commander weights approximately 643 kg more than 1985 Mercury Sable.
Because 2010 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Mercury Sable | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Mercury | Jeep |
Model | Sable | Commander |
Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2937 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2790 mm |