1985 Mercury Sable vs. 2010 Land Rover Defender
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Defender is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,937 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Land Rover Defender weights approximately 1308 kg more than 1985 Mercury Sable.
Because 2010 Land Rover Defender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Defender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Mercury Sable | 2010 Land Rover Defender | |
| Make | Mercury | Land Rover |
| Model | Sable | Defender |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2937 cc | 2402 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2708 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2800 mm |
