1985 Mercury Sable vs. 2012 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2012 Dodge Ram is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1018 kg more than 1985 Mercury Sable.
Because 2012 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Mercury Sable | 2012 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Mercury | Dodge |
Model | Sable | Ram |
Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2512 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 390 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2418 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5817 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2017 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3569 mm |