1985 Mini MK V vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mini MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mini MK V would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (190 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1985 Mini MK V. (41 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1985 Mini MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 920 kg more than 1985 Mini MK V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (177 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mini MK V. (70 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mini MK V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Mini MK V | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mini | Toyota |
| Model | MK V | Celica |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 177 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1545 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2600 mm |
