1985 Mitsubishi Magna vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1985 Mitsubishi Magna. (111 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1985 Mitsubishi Magna.
Because 2010 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Mitsubishi Magna. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1985 Mitsubishi Magna has manual transmission. 1985 Mitsubishi Magna will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Mitsubishi Magna | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | Magna | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2490 mm |
