1985 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1985 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,344 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass (160 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1985 Nissan Bluebird. (105 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1985 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass (251 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Nissan Bluebird. (162 Nm). This means 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Nissan Bluebird | 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Bluebird | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1973 cc | 3344 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2670 mm |
