1985 Nissan Cedric vs. 2002 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2002 SsangYong Korando is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 SsangYong Korando (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1985 Nissan Cedric. (102 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1985 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 591 kg more than 1985 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Nissan Cedric. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 SsangYong Korando (256 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Nissan Cedric. (168 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2002 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Nissan Cedric | 2002 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Nissan | SsangYong |
| Model | Cedric | Korando |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1973 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Torque | 168 Nm | 256 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1866 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1850 mm |
