1985 Nissan Prairie vs. 2010 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2010 Fiat Croma is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Nissan Prairie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Nissan Prairie would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Fiat Croma (145 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1985 Nissan Prairie. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1985 Nissan Prairie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Nissan Prairie weights approximately 35 kg more than 2010 Fiat Croma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Fiat Croma (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Nissan Prairie. (121 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Nissan Prairie.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Nissan Prairie | 2010 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Nissan | Fiat |
Model | Prairie | Croma |
Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2710 mm |