1985 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,270 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Nissan Pulsar (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (58 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Renault Clio weights approximately 15 kg more than 1985 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Nissan Pulsar (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (93 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1985 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Nissan Pulsar | 1998 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Nissan | Renault |
| Model | Pulsar | Clio |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 58 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 96 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2700 mm |
